Opinion: Companies that want to deploy artificial intelligence for legal purposes must understand the risks that poses and take concrete steps to preserve privilege.

A US federal court ruling that AI chat logs are not protected by attorney-client privilege is drawing attention from insurers and financial institutions reviewing how employees use consumer AI tools ...

Federal court judges in New York and Michigan have offered split rulings on whether AI prompts seeking information from AI ...

ALBANY, N.Y. (NEWS10) — A new federal ruling is raising questions about how artificial intelligence could impact the legal ...

A recent federal ruling has stated that AI is not covered by attorney-client privilege and could potentially be used in court as evidence.

Judge Rakoff ruled that AI-generated information is not protected by attorney-client privilege if created independently by a ...

A recent decision from Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Southern District of New York marks a watershed moment in the legal profession’s ...

Opinion: Clients who want to use AI to assist their defense likely will find their efforts aren't protected from disclosure ...

The rise of AI use in deal processes, whether for analyzing term sheets, summarizing due diligence findings, or identifying mark-up issues, creates ...

Challenges and delays during the discovery process are a frustrating part of civil litigation. One cause for such delay is the attorney-client privilege arising from internal investigation materials.

Q: We are in a civil case with others, suing a person who engaged in fraudulent misconduct. We share the same attorney who is trying to establish that the attorney-client privilege between this guy ...